NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs AMD Radeon R9 M360

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 925 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 412
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 19.479
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1623
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1623

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1807 vs 1642
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8200 vs 3053
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 309.824
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 1.38
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 25.011
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 84.489
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 2709
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3328
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 2709
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3328

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1642 1807
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	442 412
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 8200
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 19.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 575.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 1.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 34.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 87.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3360

Compare specifications (specs)