NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs AMD Radeon R9 M360

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1125 MHz
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 396
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 19.479
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1623
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1623
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 February 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 1228 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1252 MHz vs 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 441 vs 396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 19.856 vs 19.479
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2875 vs 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2875 vs 1623

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

  • Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
  • Around 39% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1812 vs 1646
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8083 vs 3053
  • Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 309.824
  • Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 1.38
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 25.011
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 84.489
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 2709
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3328
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 2709
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3328
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 29.6 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 256
Floating-point performance 947.2 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1812 vs 1646
Geekbench - OpenCL 8083 vs 3053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 575.773 vs 309.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.902 vs 1.38
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 34.15 vs 25.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 87.811 vs 84.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2801 vs 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2801 vs 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3328

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1646
1812
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
441
396
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3053
8083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.856
19.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
309.824
575.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.38
1.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25.011
34.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
84.489
87.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2709
2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2875
1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3328
3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2709
2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2875
1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3328
3360
Name NVIDIA Quadro P400 AMD Radeon R9 M360
PassMark - G3D Mark 1646 1812
PassMark - G2D Mark 441 396
Geekbench - OpenCL 3053 8083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 19.856 19.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 309.824 575.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.38 1.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.011 34.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 84.489 87.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2709 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2875 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3328 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2709 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2875 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3328 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 617

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P400 AMD Radeon R9 M360

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 1.0
Code name GP107 Tropo
Launch date 7 February 2017 5 May 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $119.99
Place in performance rating 999 1002
Price now $119.99
Type Workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 18.70
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1252 MHz 925 MHz
Core clock speed 1228 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 679.9 gflops 947.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 512
Texture fill rate 21.25 GTexel / s 29.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 1,500 million
Compute units 8

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x mini-DisplayPort No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 32.1 GB / s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz 1125 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore