NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 1086.3x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 37915
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 145.843
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 vs 37.16
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 10471
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3338
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 10471
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3338
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 2 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 vs 37915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 vs 37.16 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3338 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1792
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 5,304 gflops
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13812 vs 11653
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 854 vs 827
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 vs 1590.392
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 11.365
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 751.626
- Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5757 vs 4904
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops vs 5,304 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13812 vs 11653 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 854 vs 827 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 vs 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 vs 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 vs 751.626 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5757 vs 4904 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11653 | 13812 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 | 854 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 37915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 | 5757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM200 |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 2 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | $649 |
Place in performance rating | 275 | 297 |
Price now | $799.99 | $679.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | 23.43 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 6,060 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,000 million |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |