NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 15.2x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11630 vs 9565
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 809 vs 792
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 141.671
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 10116
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 10116
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4904 vs 4739
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11630 vs 9565 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 809 vs 792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 141.671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 vs 4739 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1792
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 5,304 gflops
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53279 vs 42289
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3600.035 vs 1590.392
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.2 vs 11.365
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.144 vs 45.977
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 791.572 vs 751.626
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 5,304 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53279 vs 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3600.035 vs 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.2 vs 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.144 vs 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 791.572 vs 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11630 | 9565 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 809 | 792 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 53279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 141.671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 3600.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 13.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 133.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 791.572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Fiji |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 10 July 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 289 |
Price now | $799.99 | $399.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | 35.98 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |