NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and NVIDIA Quadro K1200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1721
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1721
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3288
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3288
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 vs 28 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3288 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 35.97 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2943 vs 1630
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 vs 240
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8818 vs 6225
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 2622
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 2622
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2943 vs 1630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 vs 240 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8818 vs 6225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 vs 2622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 vs 2622 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1630 | 2943 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 579 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6225 | 8818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2622 | 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2622 | 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP108 | GM107 |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 | 28 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 802 | 803 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | |
Price now | $289.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 1,151 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 35.97 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 160 mm | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |