NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 601 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6163 vs 5107
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2018 vs 7 August 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 601 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6163 vs 5107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 67.31 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 1344 vs 256
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,615 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2752 vs 1633
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 vs 241
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 2622
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 2622
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.31 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,615 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2752 vs 1633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 vs 241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4825 vs 2622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4825 vs 2622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3685 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 | 2752 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6163 | 5107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2622 | 4825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2622 | 4825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.713 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 685.1 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.189 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.929 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.712 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP108 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2018 | 7 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 798 | 801 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329.99 | |
| Price now | $391 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.47 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 601 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 67.31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P500 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
ATIFirePro 2260 PCI
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
AMDFirePro M4100
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1200
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
NVIDIAT600
