NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 601 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6225 vs 5107
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 vs 7 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 601 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6225 vs 5107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 67.31 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 1344 vs 256
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,615 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2806 vs 1633
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 241
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 2622
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 2622
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3685
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 67.31 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 1,615 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2806 vs 1633 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4825 vs 2622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4825 vs 2622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3685 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 | 2806 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6225 | 5107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2622 | 4825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2622 | 4825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.713 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 685.1 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.189 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.929 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.712 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP108 | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 | 7 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 803 | 806 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329.99 | |
Price now | $391 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 601 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 67.31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor |