AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro P500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA Quadro P500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 1834.4x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 2622
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 2622
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11459 vs 6225
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 352 vs 241
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2116 vs 1633
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 January 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 vs 2622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 vs 2622 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11459 vs 6225 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 vs 241 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2116 vs 1633 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1218 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2775
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 1218 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2775 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P500
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA Quadro P500 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 2622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 2622 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11459 | 6225 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | 241 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2116 | 1633 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GP108 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 January 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 802 | 803 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1519 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 256 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 32.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4250
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830A
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P500
