NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs AMD FirePro M4100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and AMD FirePro M4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 670 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1630 vs 1059
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6225 vs 5067
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3591
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3591
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 vs 16 October 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 670 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops vs 514.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1630 vs 1059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6225 vs 5067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3591 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 240
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 vs 240 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | AMD FirePro M4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1630 | 1059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 623 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6225 | 5067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 432.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.48 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P500 | AMD FirePro M4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Mars |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 | 16 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 802 | 804 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 670 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 514.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 16.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
AppAcceleration |