NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5000 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12624 vs 11823
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52822 vs 40088
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 13107
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 13107
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2016 vs 5 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12624 vs 11823 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52822 vs 40088 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 vs 13107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 285.2 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 672
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3077
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3077
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 vs 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3077 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12624 | 11823 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 672 | 687 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52822 | 40088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3409 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3409 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM200 |
Launch date | 1 October 2016 | 5 March 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | $4,999 |
Place in performance rating | 241 | 242 |
Price now | $1,699.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 988 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |