NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
244x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 14.206
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 15489
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3409
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3077
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 15489
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3409
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3077

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2021 vs 1 October 2016
Texture fill rate	67.65 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.641 vs 14.206
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15760 vs 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8923 vs 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8045 vs 3077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15760 vs 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8923 vs 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8045 vs 3077

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000

2.3x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 712 MHz
Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1057 MHz
4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
6x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12640 vs 6831
Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 403
Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52508 vs 50663
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 165.993
Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 vs 1980.866
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 vs 135.641
Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 vs 745.481
3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1330 vs 421

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1607 MHz vs 712 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz vs 1057 MHz
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	9016 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	12640 vs 6831
PassMark - G2D Mark	673 vs 403
Geekbench - OpenCL	52508 vs 50663
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	223.558 vs 165.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2698.914 vs 1980.866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	140.845 vs 135.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	927.006 vs 745.481
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1330 vs 421

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6831

12640

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

403

673

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

50663

52508

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

165.993

223.558

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1980.866

2698.914

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.641

14.206

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

135.641

140.845

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

745.481

927.006

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15760

15489

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8923

3409

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8045

3077

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15760

15489

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8923

3409

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8045

3077

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

421

1330

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark	6831	12640
PassMark - G2D Mark	403	673
Geekbench - OpenCL	50663	52508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	165.993	223.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1980.866	2698.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.641	14.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	135.641	140.845
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	745.481	927.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15760	15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8923	3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8045	3077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15760	15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8923	3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8045	3077
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	421	1330

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Code name	GA107	GP104
Launch date	2021	1 October 2016
Place in performance rating	248	247
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,499
Price now		$1,699.99
Value for money (0-100)		8.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1057 MHz	1733 MHz
Core clock speed	712 MHz	1607 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	67.65 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.329 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.329 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	2048
Pixel fill rate	42.28 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	67.65 GTexel/s	277.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt
Floating-point performance		8,873 gflops
Transistor count		7,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Display Port		1.4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.2	12
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6	5.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	192 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	9016 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Stereo
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView
nView Display Management
Optimus