NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2048
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14694 vs 12585
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 673
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55343 vs 52705
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 927.006
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 15489
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3638 vs 3409
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3077
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 15489
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3638 vs 3409
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3077
• Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6812 vs 6008

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000

• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1683 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 8,186 gflops
• Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 180 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 8008 MHz
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 182.11
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 vs 1797.792
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 vs 14.071
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 vs 26.444

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14694 12585
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	875 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55343 52705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.11 223.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1797.792 2698.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.071 14.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.444 140.845
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1035.984 927.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3077
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	6812 6008

Compare specifications (specs)