NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
716.6x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64033 vs 52761
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3409
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3409
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3077
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3077

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 1 October 2016
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 2048
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	64033 vs 52761
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3077
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3077

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1380 MHz
2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 671 vs 510
Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12572 vs 11109
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 14496
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 14496

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	671 vs 510
PassMark - G3D Mark	12572 vs 11109
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15489 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15489 vs 14496

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

510

671

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11109

12572

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

64033

52761

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

15489

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

15489

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3409

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3409

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3077

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3077

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G2D Mark	510	671
PassMark - G3D Mark	11109	12572
Geekbench - OpenCL	64033	52761
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3077
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		223.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2698.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		14.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		140.845
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		927.006
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		6008

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	N19E-Q1	GP104
Launch date	27 May 2019	1 October 2016
Place in performance rating	241	244
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,499
Price now		$1,699.99
Value for money (0-100)		8.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1733 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	1607 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	2048
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	277.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	7,200 million
Floating-point performance		8,873 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Display Port		1.4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	192 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	9016 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready
3D Stereo
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView
nView Display Management
Optimus