NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 716.6x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
  • Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
  • Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64319 vs 49433
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3409
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3409
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3077
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3077
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 1 October 2016
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 2048
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 64319 vs 49433
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 vs 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 vs 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3077
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3077

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000

  • Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
  • Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 523
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12337 vs 11189
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 14496
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 14496
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed 1733 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 673 vs 523
PassMark - G3D Mark 12337 vs 11189
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15489 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15489 vs 14496

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
523
673
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11189
12337
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
64319
49433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3077
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3077
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G2D Mark 523 673
PassMark - G3D Mark 11189 12337
Geekbench - OpenCL 64319 49433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 3077
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 3077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 223.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2698.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 140.845
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 927.006
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6008

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name N19E-Q1 GP104
Launch date 27 May 2019 1 October 2016
Place in performance rating 229 230
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499
Price now $1,699.99
Value for money (0-100) 8.38

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1733 MHz
Core clock speed 945 MHz 1607 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 2048
Pixel fill rate 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s 277.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 7,200 million
Floating-point performance 8,873 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Display Port 1.4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size Large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4 5.1
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 192 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 9016 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready
3D Stereo
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView
nView Display Management
Optimus