NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs AMD Radeon R9 M360

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P520

AMD Radeon R9 M360

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 900 MHz
Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 925 MHz
807.1x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
5.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2105 vs 1836
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2801
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2801
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 1623
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 1623

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2105 vs 1836
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527 vs 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527 vs 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566 vs 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566 vs 1623

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 vs 243
Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8493 vs 7368
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2295
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2295

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	451 vs 243
Geekbench - OpenCL	8493 vs 7368
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

243

451

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2105

1836

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7368

8493

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

2801

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

2801

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

1623

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

1623

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3360

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P520	AMD Radeon R9 M360
PassMark - G2D Mark	243	451
PassMark - G3D Mark	2105	1836
Geekbench - OpenCL	7368	8493
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527	2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527	2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566	1623
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566	1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295	3360
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		19.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		575.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		34.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		87.811

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P520	AMD Radeon R9 M360
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Code name	GP108	Tropo
Launch date	27 May 2019	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	766	962
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	925 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	512
Pixel fill rate	23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s	29.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	1800 million
Compute units		8
Floating-point performance		947.2 gflops
Transistor count		1,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Multi monitor support
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.10 GB/s	72 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore