NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 807.1x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2096 vs 1901
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2809
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2809
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 30 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2096 vs 1901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 vs 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 vs 2809 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 27.7x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 1800 million
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 524 vs 239
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9662 vs 7855
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 3566
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 3566
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2295
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2295
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 1800 million |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 524 vs 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9662 vs 7855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 | 524 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2096 | 1901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7855 | 9662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P520 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 774 | 776 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1800 million | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor |