NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • 807.1x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2105 vs 1938
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2809
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2809
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 30 June 2016
Core clock speed 1303 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2105 vs 1938
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3527 vs 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3527 vs 2809

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
  • 27.7x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 1800 million
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 vs 243
  • Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9616 vs 7368
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 3566
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 3566
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2295
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2295
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 512 vs 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 1800 million
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 535 vs 243
Geekbench - OpenCL 9616 vs 7368
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3666 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3666 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
243
535
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2105
1938
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7368
9616
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3527
2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3527
2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3566
3666
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3566
3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2295
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2295
3358
Name NVIDIA Quadro P520 AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark 243 535
PassMark - G3D Mark 2105 1938
Geekbench - OpenCL 7368 9616
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3527 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3527 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3566 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3566 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2295 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2295 3358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 638.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 41.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 112.347

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P520 AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 1.0
Code name GP108 Cape Verde
Launch date 27 May 2019 30 June 2016
Place in performance rating 766 768
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1493 MHz
Core clock speed 1303 MHz 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 512
Pixel fill rate 23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s 29.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 1800 million 65 Watt
Floating-point performance 947.2 gflops
Transistor count 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.10 GB/s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 4500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

Multi Monitor