NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1093 MHz
• 546.4x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 2645
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 2645

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• 40x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 1800 million
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 239
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3242 vs 2092
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10582 vs 7859
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 3527
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 3527
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2295
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	239 318
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2092 3242
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 10582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3527 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3527 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3566 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3566 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2295 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2295 3359

Compare specifications (specs)