NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P520

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 771 MHz
242.1x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 98.69 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz

Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 771 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s vs 98.69 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
18x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 1800 million
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 347 vs 237
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3217 vs 2091
Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11613 vs 7960
Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 3527
Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 3527
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3566
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3566
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 2295
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 2295

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1536 vs 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 1800 million
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	347 vs 237
PassMark - G3D Mark	3217 vs 2091
Geekbench - OpenCL	11613 vs 7960
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6747 vs 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6747 vs 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

237

347

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2091

3217

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7960

11613

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

6747

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

6747

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3362

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G2D Mark	237	347
PassMark - G3D Mark	2091	3217
Geekbench - OpenCL	7960	11613
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527	6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527	6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295	3362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		5.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		355.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		34.772

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP108	GK104
Launch date	27 May 2019	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	758	761
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Price now		$309.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.80
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	771 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	1536
Pixel fill rate	23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s	98.69 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	1800 million	100 Watt
Floating-point performance		2,369 gflops
Transistor count		3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Multi monitor support
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
Interface		MXM-B (3.0)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.10 GB/s	115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus