NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 771 MHz
- 242.1x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 98.69 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s vs 98.69 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
- 18x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 1800 million
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 240
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3163 vs 2100
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 vs 7905
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 3527
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 3527
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3566
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3566
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 2295
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 2295
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 1800 million |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 240 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3163 vs 2100 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 vs 7905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 3527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 3527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 2295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 2295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 363 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2100 | 3163 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7905 | 11427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 3362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP108 | GK104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 760 | 763 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $309.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 771 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1800 million | 100 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | ||
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |