NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA GRID K220Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro P520

NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 745 MHz
250.5x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2091 vs 912
4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 833
4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 833
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 2128
Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 2128

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 2 July 2014
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 745 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2091 vs 912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566 vs 2128

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q

4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
8x lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 1800 million
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 237
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2660 vs 2295
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2660 vs 2295

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1536 vs 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 1800 million
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	539 vs 237
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2660 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2660 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K220Q

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

237

539

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2091

912

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

833

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

833

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

2128

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

2128

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

2660

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

2660

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA GRID K220Q
PassMark - G2D Mark	237	539
PassMark - G3D Mark	2091	912
Geekbench - OpenCL	7960
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527	833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527	833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566	2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566	2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295	2660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295	2660

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA GRID K220Q
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP108	GK104
Launch date	27 May 2019	2 July 2014
Place in performance rating	758	760
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$469
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	1536
Pixel fill rate	23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s	95.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	1800 million	225 Watt
Floating-point performance		2,289 gflops
Transistor count		3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	40.10 GB/s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor