NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 776 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 384 vs 288
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 894.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 102 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 3828 MHz
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3305 vs 2006
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 vs 443
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1914
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1914

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 37.2 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3305 2006
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	517 443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1914
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1914

Compare specifications (specs)