NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 756 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 977 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3317 vs 2792
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 533 vs 417
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 vs 8001
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 3854
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 3854
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 756 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 977 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 1,000 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3317 vs 2792 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 533 vs 417 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 vs 8001 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3317 | 2792 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 533 | 417 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 8001 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
| Place in performance rating | 563 | 565 |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 977 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 1,000 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P600 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
ATIFireMV 2250
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
