NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 756 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 977 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3305 vs 2795
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 vs 415
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 vs 7954
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 3854
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 3854
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 756 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 977 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 1,000 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3305 vs 2795 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 vs 415 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 vs 7954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 3854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 3854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3305 | 2795 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 | 415 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 7954 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 3854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 3854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Place in performance rating | 568 | 569 |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 977 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 756 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 1,000 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 31.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |