NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P40

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Tesla P40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA Tesla P40

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
540.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 430
Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63882 vs 62478
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 9538
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 9538
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3699
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3699
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3340
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3340

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 13 September 2016
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	508 vs 430
Geekbench - OpenCL	63882 vs 62478
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 9538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 9538
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40

Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11769 vs 11060

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Pipelines	3840 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11769 vs 11060

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

508

430

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11060

11769

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

63882

62478

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

9538

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

9538

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3340

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G2D Mark	508	430
PassMark - G3D Mark	11060	11769
Geekbench - OpenCL	63882	62478
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	9538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	9538
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		300.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3559.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		19.757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		204.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1214.142

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Tesla P40
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	N19E-Q1	GP102
Launch date	27 May 2019	13 September 2016
Place in performance rating	244	247
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1531 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	1303 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	3840
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	367.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	11,800 million
Floating-point performance		11,758 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	480.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	10008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready