NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 776.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
  • Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
  • Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63761 vs 55343
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3638
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3638
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3344
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3344
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 2 November 2017
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 63761 vs 55343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3344

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

  • Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
  • Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • Around 6% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2304
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 513
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14690 vs 11130
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 14496
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 14496
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed 1683 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Pipelines 2432 vs 2304
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 875 vs 513
PassMark - G3D Mark 14690 vs 11130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16128 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16128 vs 14496

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
513
875
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11130
14690
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
63761
55343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3638
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3344
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark 513 875
PassMark - G3D Mark 11130 14690
Geekbench - OpenCL 63761 55343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 3344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1035.984
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6812

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name N19E-Q1 GP104
Launch date 27 May 2019 2 November 2017
Place in performance rating 241 243
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $399
Price now $379.99
Value for money (0-100) 44.74

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1683 MHz
Core clock speed 945 MHz 1607 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 2432
Pixel fill rate 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s 255.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 180 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 7,200 million
Floating-point performance 8,186 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size Large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 256.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 8008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready
Multi-Projection