NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
776.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64217 vs 55399
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3638
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3638
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3344
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3344

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 2 November 2017
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 180 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	64217 vs 55399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3344

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Around 6% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2304
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 874 vs 513
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14693 vs 11097
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 14496
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 14496

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1683 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Pipelines	2432 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	874 vs 513
PassMark - G3D Mark	14693 vs 11097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16128 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16128 vs 14496

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

513

874

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11097

14693

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

64217

55399

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

16128

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

16128

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3638

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3638

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3344

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3344

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark	513	874
PassMark - G3D Mark	11097	14693
Geekbench - OpenCL	64217	55399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3638
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1035.984
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		6814

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	N19E-Q1	GP104
Launch date	27 May 2019	2 November 2017
Place in performance rating	240	243
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$399
Price now		$379.99
Value for money (0-100)		44.74
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1683 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	1607 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	2432
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	255.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	180 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	7,200 million
Floating-point performance		8,186 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	256.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	8008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready
Multi-Projection