NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 776.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64074 vs 55343
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3638
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3638
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3344
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3344
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64074 vs 55343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 6% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2304
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 511
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14694 vs 11130
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 14496
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 14496
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 945 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 511 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14694 vs 11130 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 | 875 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11130 | 14694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64074 | 55343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6812 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N19E-Q1 | GP104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 243 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | Large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready | ||
Multi-Projection |