NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 574.9x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 13339
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 13339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 513
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 vs 11130
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71304 vs 63761
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 945 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 513 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 vs 11130 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71304 vs 63761 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 | 797 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11130 | 12920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63761 | 71304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N19E-Q1 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 241 | 242 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | Large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |