NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega II videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1612 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 16149
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 16149
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2813
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2813
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2813 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 748 vs 518
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15597 vs 12207
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 vs 518 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15597 vs 12207 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | 748 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12207 | 15597 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2813 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99583 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 20 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | Dec 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 172 | 175 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1720 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 110.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 440.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 475 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 13230 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | Dual-slot |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 825.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |