NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 19377
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 19377
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 19377 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 7438
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 506
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12998 vs 11759
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 7438 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 506 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12998 vs 11759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 7879 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 506 | 537 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11759 | 12998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83425 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 171 | 168 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | 259.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.59 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
