NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 4216.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 6316
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3715
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3715
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3356
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 550 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12640 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 27566 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 171 | 165 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
