NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1471 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 91% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 210 Watt
  • Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 6870
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 14462
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 14462
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 14 August 2017
Boost clock speed 1560 MHz vs 1471 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 210 Watt
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7438 vs 6870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19529 vs 14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19529 vs 14462

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

  • Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1156 MHz vs 1110 MHz
  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
  • Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
  • Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 551
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13306 vs 12627
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1156 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Texture fill rate 330.00 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
Pipelines 3584 vs 2560
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 776 vs 551
PassMark - G3D Mark 13306 vs 12627
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7438
6870
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
551
776
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12627
13306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19529
14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19529
14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3361
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7438 6870
PassMark - G2D Mark 551 776
PassMark - G3D Mark 12627 13306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19529 14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19529 14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3361
Geekbench - OpenCL 163998
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 184.405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1765.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1022.925

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 14 August 2017
Place in performance rating 171 210
Type Laptop Desktop
Design Radeon RX Vega Series
Launch price (MSRP) $399

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1560 MHz 1471 MHz
Core clock speed 1110 MHz 1156 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) 21 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.987 TFLOPS 10.5 TFLOPs
Pipelines 2560 3584
Pixel fill rate 99.84 GPixel/s 94.00 GP/s
Texture fill rate 249.6 GTexel/s 330.00 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 210 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 12,500 million
Compute units 56
Floating-point performance 10.5 TFLOPs
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 3584
Texture Units 256

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 410 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 2048 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
ZeroCore