NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1471 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 91% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 210 Watt
- Environ 9% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 versus 6870
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 versus 14462
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 versus 14462
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 14 August 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1471 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 210 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 versus 6870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 versus 14462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 versus 14462 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1156 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 32% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 330.00 GTexel/s versus 249.6 GTexel/s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2560
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 versus 551
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13304 versus 12627
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1156 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 330.00 GTexel/s versus 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 2560 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 versus 551 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13304 versus 12627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 6870 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 775 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | 13304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 14462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 14462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1765.06 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.606 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 171 | 211 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1471 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1156 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21 TFLOPs |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 10.5 TFLOPs |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 94.00 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 330.00 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 210 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Unités de Compute | 56 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 410 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
