NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3719x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 vs 2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 551
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19608 vs 12627
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 19529
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 19529
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 551 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19608 vs 12627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 2 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 927 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | 19608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117526 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 23 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 171 | 109 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | IGP | 2-Slot |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |