NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

2.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
3719x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 2

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7438 vs 2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 506
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19514 vs 11759
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 19529
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 19529

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed	1650 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Boost clock speed	1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Pipelines	3072 vs 2560
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	920 vs 506
PassMark - G3D Mark	19514 vs 11759
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27179 vs 19529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27179 vs 19529
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3715

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

7438

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

506

920

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11759

19514

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

27179

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

27179

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3355

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7438	2
PassMark - G2D Mark	506	920
PassMark - G3D Mark	11759	19514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529	27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529	27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3355
Geekbench - OpenCL		115804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		338.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4571.03
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		31.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		190.349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1653.08

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Code name	TU104	TU104
Launch date	27 May 2019	23 July 2019
Place in performance rating	171	110
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1815 MHz
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.97 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	3072
Pixel fill rate	99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million
CUDA cores		3072
Maximum GPU temperature		89 C
Render output units		64
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Display Port		1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	6 pin + 8 pin
Width	IGP	2-Slot
Height		4.556” (115.7mm)
Length		10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		650 Watt
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	496 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Technologies
Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready