NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 3719x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 2
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7438 vs 2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1110 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
  • 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 551
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19608 vs 12627
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 19529
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 19529
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed 1650 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Boost clock speed 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Pipelines 3072 vs 2560
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 927 vs 551
PassMark - G3D Mark 19608 vs 12627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27179 vs 19529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27179 vs 19529
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3715

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7438
2
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
551
927
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12627
19608
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19529
27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19529
27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3355
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7438 2
PassMark - G2D Mark 551 927
PassMark - G3D Mark 12627 19608
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19529 27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19529 27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3355
Geekbench - OpenCL 117526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 337.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4566.815
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 31.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 190.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1654.321

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU104
Launch date 27 May 2019 23 July 2019
Place in performance rating 171 109
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $699

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1560 MHz 1815 MHz
Core clock speed 1110 MHz 1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 3072
Pixel fill rate 99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 249.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million
CUDA cores 3072
Maximum GPU temperature 89 C
Render output units 64

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 6 pin + 8 pin
Width IGP 2-Slot
Height 4.556” (115.7mm)
Length 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 496 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready