NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 559.8x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 March 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 12998
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 848 vs 537
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 143963 vs 83425
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 19377
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 19377
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1132 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 12998 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 848 vs 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 143963 vs 83425 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 vs 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 vs 19377 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12998 | 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 | 848 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83425 | 143963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU104 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 168 | 93 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 870.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1696 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon 760M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A530M
