NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 559.8x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 March 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12721 vs 11722
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 802 vs 412
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138492 vs 79950
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19382 vs 19073
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19382 vs 19073
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1132 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12721 vs 11722 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 802 vs 412 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138492 vs 79950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19382 vs 19073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19382 vs 19073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11722 | 12721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 802 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 79950 | 138492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19073 | 19382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19073 | 19382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 277.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 981.689 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU104 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 98 | 27 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 870.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1696 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4200 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
