NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 1563.3x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13640 vs 11654
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 42289
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 15267
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 15267
- Around 61% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 4904
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 6 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 vs 11654 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 42289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 4904 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- 2x more core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 584
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 584 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 11654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 827 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 42289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 4904 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 169 | 275 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
Price now | $799.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |