NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 75438
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 13123
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 13123
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 23 June 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 75438 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 13123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 13123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1475 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 377.6 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14631 vs 13640
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 948 vs 584
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1475 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14631 vs 13640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 948 vs 584 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 14631 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 948 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 75438 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 13123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 13123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 23 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 172 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1475 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | 755.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | 24.17 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | 12.08 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 94.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 377.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12500 million |
| Compute units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
