NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 185 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 6769
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 11616
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 11616
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 3 April 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 6769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 11616 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 705
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 3346
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 3346
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4909 vs 3714
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4909 vs 3714
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 vs 705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 752 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 6769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 18294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 18294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 4909 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 3 April 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 189 | 187 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VR Ready |