NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1247 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1546 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 295 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16063 vs 14394
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 vs 195.478
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 2129.009
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 14.889
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 14744
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 14744
- Around 42% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 7522
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 7 August 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1247 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1546 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 295 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 vs 14394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 vs 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 vs 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 vs 14.889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3717 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 vs 7522 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 749
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 vs 105171
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.271 vs 118.544
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 vs 1106.12
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 vs 749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 vs 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 vs 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 vs 1106.12 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 | 14394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 800 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 7522 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 7 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 154 | 170 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Price now | $449.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 295 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 12,500 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |