NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1247 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 48% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 295 Watt
- 7.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16063 versus 14391
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 versus 195.478
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 2129.009
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 versus 14.889
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 14744
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 14744
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 7519
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 7 August 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1247 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 295 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 versus 14391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 versus 195.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 2129.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 versus 14.889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3717 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 7519 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 749
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 105171
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.271 versus 118.544
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 1106.12
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 749 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 105171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 versus 118.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 1106.12 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 | 14391 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 800 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 204168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 195.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 2129.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 14.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 129.271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 1328.033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 7519 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 7 August 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 154 | 170 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1546 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz | 1247 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 295 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 12,500 million |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 279 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon 760M
