NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1025 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 vs 4284
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 380
- 6.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 16429
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 6337
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 6337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 11 January 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1025 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 vs 4284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 16429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 6337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 6337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3715 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 200 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 | 4284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 16429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 6337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 6337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | GM206 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 11 January 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
| Place in performance rating | 138 | 473 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1025 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 2,940 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIARTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
