NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16063 vs 6284
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 371
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3260
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 vs 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 200 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 | 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 30 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
| Place in performance rating | 154 | 356 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon 760M
