NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD FireStream 9370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD FireStream 9370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 825 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4600 MHz
  • 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 2528
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 763
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 August 2018 vs 23 June 2010
Core clock speed 1005 MHz vs 825 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 4600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 vs 2528
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 vs 763

Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9370

  • Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt vs 250 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9370

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19370
2528
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
869
763
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 AMD FireStream 9370
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 2528
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 763
Geekbench - OpenCL 136722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3290
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 AMD FireStream 9370

Essentials

Architecture Turing TeraScale 2
Code name TU102 Cypress
Launch date 13 August 2018 23 June 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $9,999
Place in performance rating 103 130
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 1005 MHz 825 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 2,154 million
Floating-point performance 2,640.0 gflops
Pipelines 1600
Texture fill rate 66.0 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 4600 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 147.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR5