NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19862 vs 11814
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 vs 611
- Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 147317 vs 78188
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 13720
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 13720
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 20 June 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19862 vs 11814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 vs 611 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 147317 vs 78188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 13720 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6381 vs 3652
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8915 vs 3290
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6381 vs 3652
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8915 vs 3290
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6381 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8915 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6381 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8915 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19862 | 11814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 | 611 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 147317 | 78188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 6381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 8915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 6381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 8915 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU102 | GP100 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 20 June 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | $5,699 |
| Place in performance rating | 96 | 176 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | 15,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Texture fill rate | 331.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 720.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
IntelArc A770
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAA30
