NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD FirePro W8100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD FirePro W8100

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 824 MHz
529.9x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 220 Watt
Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 5494
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3699
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 5494
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3699

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 23 June 2014
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 824 MHz
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 220 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3349

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100

3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7333 vs 6456
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 727 vs 417
Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34705 vs 32981
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.339 vs 87.83

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2560 vs 768
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7333 vs 6456
PassMark - G2D Mark	727 vs 417
Geekbench - OpenCL	34705 vs 32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	93.339 vs 87.83

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6456

7333

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

417

727

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

32981

34705

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.83

93.339

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

5494

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3349

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

5494

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3349

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	AMD FirePro W8100
PassMark - G3D Mark	6456	7333
PassMark - G2D Mark	417	727
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981	34705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83	93.339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009	5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009	5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2333.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		8.816
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		112.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		440.107

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	AMD FirePro W8100
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Code name	TU117	Hawaii
Launch date	27 May 2019	23 June 2014
Place in performance rating	398	395
Type	Mobile Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	824 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	2560
Pixel fill rate	46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s	131.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	220 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	6,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,219 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
DisplayPort count		4
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		279 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	128 GB/s	320 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5