NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD FirePro W8100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 824 MHz
  • 529.9x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 220 Watt
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 5494
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3699
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 5494
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3699
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 23 June 2014
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 824 MHz
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 220 Watt
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9009 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9009 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3349

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100

  • 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7333 vs 6466
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 727 vs 416
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34705 vs 32981
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.339 vs 87.83
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2560 vs 768
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7333 vs 6466
PassMark - G2D Mark 727 vs 416
Geekbench - OpenCL 34705 vs 32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 93.339 vs 87.83

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6466
7333
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
416
727
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
32981
34705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
87.83
93.339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3349
Name NVIDIA Quadro T1000 AMD FirePro W8100
PassMark - G3D Mark 6466 7333
PassMark - G2D Mark 416 727
Geekbench - OpenCL 32981 34705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 87.83 93.339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9009 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9009 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2333.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.816
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 112.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 440.107

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 AMD FirePro W8100

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 2.0
Code name TU117 Hawaii
Launch date 27 May 2019 23 June 2014
Place in performance rating 398 395
Type Mobile Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1455 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 824 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768 2560
Pixel fill rate 46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s 131.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 220 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 4,219 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
DisplayPort count 4
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 279 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 128 GB/s 320 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5