NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- 1169.5x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 4463
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 404 vs 292
- Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 17466
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 67.209
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 7239
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 7239
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 vs 4463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 vs 292 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 67.209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 7239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 7239 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3718 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 4463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 292 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 67.209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 7239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 7239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP106B |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 595 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 59.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |