NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 1045.2x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 6332
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 20732
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 75.758
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 25 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 vs 6332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 75.758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 404
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 75.758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 487 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |