NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 6494
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 404
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 32981
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 87.83
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9009
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9009
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 6494 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 404 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 32981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 vs 87.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 9009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 564 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 134.765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU107 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 400 | 376 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M365X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
