NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 706 MHz
772.8x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 90.37 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 122 Watt
Around 48% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 3987
2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 11444
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 31.318
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 6288
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3680
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 6288
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3680

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 17 August 2012
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 706 MHz
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s vs 90.37 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 122 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6494 vs 3987
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981 vs 11444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83 vs 31.318
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009 vs 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009 vs 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3352

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 vs 404

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1536 vs 768
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	440 vs 404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6494

3987

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

404

440

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

32981

11444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.83

31.318

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

6288

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3680

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3352

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

6288

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3680

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3352

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	NVIDIA Quadro K5000
PassMark - G3D Mark	6494	3987
PassMark - G2D Mark	404	440
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981	11444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83	31.318
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009	6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009	6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		681.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		32.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		67.311
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1351

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	TU117	GK104
Launch date	27 May 2019	17 August 2012
Place in performance rating	400	669
Type	Mobile Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,499
Price now		$1,950
Value for money (0-100)		2.47
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	1536
Pixel fill rate	46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s	90.37 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	122 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	3,540 million
Floating-point performance		2,169 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128 GB/s	172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5