NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- 1500x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 3670
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 12475
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 43.877
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 3575
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 vs 3670 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 43.877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 3575 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 404
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3718
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3359
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3718
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 3670 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 43.877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 583 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $176.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 46.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |