NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85559 vs 32981
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 vs 87.83
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 9009
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 9009
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85559 vs 32981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 vs 87.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 9009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6603 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 85559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 282.628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 391 | 195 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
