NVIDIA Quadro T1000 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- 3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 4.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 November 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3714 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 69.84 GTexel/s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 768
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85474 versus 32981
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 versus 87.83
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 9009
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 9009
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 69.84 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 768 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85474 versus 32981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 versus 87.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 9009 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6599 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 85474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 282.628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU117 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 391 | 194 |
Genre | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | 222.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | 14.24 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.84 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 13600 million |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |