NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 1540.5x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 47 Watt
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 5923
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 5923
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 5923 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2238
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
| Place in performance rating | 350 | 525 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
