NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon E8870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon E8870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 1900x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7788 vs 3368
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 36.948
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 874.689
- 9.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 1.11
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 4620
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 4620
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 vs 3368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 vs 36.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 vs 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 vs 1.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 4620 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 708 vs 483
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 vs 2476
- 8.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 2238
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 vs 2476
- 8.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 2238
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 vs 483 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 vs 2238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon E8870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 3368 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 708 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 36.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 1.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 18191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 18191 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon E8870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Saturn |
Place in performance rating | 350 | 353 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |