NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 804.9x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7833 vs 6284
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 vs 371
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 9390
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 9390
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7833 vs 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 9390 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2476
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 2238
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2476
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 2238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7833 | 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42927 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | GM204 |
| Place in performance rating | 353 | 356 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
