NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1180 MHz
604x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
12.5x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 225 Watt
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7845 vs 3884
Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42911 vs 27798
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 8909
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 8909

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz vs 1180 MHz
Texture fill rate	91.20 GTexel/s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7845 vs 3884
Geekbench - OpenCL	42911 vs 27798
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9851 vs 8909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9851 vs 8909

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

Around 9% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 855 MHz
2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 618 vs 461
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 2476
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2238
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 2476
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2238

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	930 MHz vs 855 MHz
Pipelines	2048 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	618 vs 461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 2238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7845

3884

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

461

618

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42911

27798

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9851

8909

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2476

3709

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2238

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9851

8909

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2476

3709

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2238

3359

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile	NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	7845	3884
PassMark - G2D Mark	461	618
Geekbench - OpenCL	42911	27798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	157.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1934.012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	136.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	684.333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9851	8909
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2476	3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2238	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9851	8909
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2476	3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2238	3359

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile	NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	TU117	GM204
Place in performance rating	354	350
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch date		30 August 2015
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	1180 MHz
Core clock speed	855 MHz	930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.837 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.918 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2048
Pixel fill rate	45.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	91.20 GTexel/s	151.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	5,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,833 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	160.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5