NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1002 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1053 MHz
- 1538.8x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 67.39 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41349 vs 20842
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 427
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 1409
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1002 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1053 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 67.39 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41349 vs 20842 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 427 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 vs 1409 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41349 | 20842 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | 427 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 | 1409 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Baffin |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 381 | 432 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1053 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1002 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 67.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,157 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |